IWC Q&A: If we can’t get Sting vs Taker at WM 27, why not do Taker vs Vince?
Posted in IWC on Sep 22nd, 2011 5 Comments »
Granted the match may not be as bad a** as any of Taker’s last 4 WM, but it would still be memorable like Hogan vs Vince at WM 19 or Vince vs HBK at WM 22.
Vince is obviously a far bigger threat than Barrett, Jackson, and Corre (not to mention far bigger name and credibility as well). And it’s not a feud that has been overdone like against Kane. And seeing how Taker vs Barrett/Jackson/Corre is badly received by at least 90% IWC, revealing Vince as Nexus’ true leader and the one who ordered the attack at Bragging Rights.
Taker vs Vince at WM 27, and then Taker vs The Corre from Backlash to Summerslam sounds pretty good for me. None of The Corre member is worthy enough to follow Batista, Edge, and Shawn Michaels twice, so why not having the owner of the biggest sports entertainment company to be added, right?
And if we’re gonna see a squash match from Undertaker at Wrestlemania 27, I’d rather see it against someone with legendary name than a rookie who isn’t guaranteed to last.
@Silent One:
No offense, mate, but Taker in in a far better shape than someone who got stroke twice.
Answer by AplusComputerServices
Dumb.