brand watches wiki – rolex watches, omega watches, replica watches

In every “Who should face The Undertaker at Wrestlemania 27?” poll =

In phenomforever.com, Cena won the poll with 42% votes.
In wrestlezone.com, Cena won the poll with 56% votes.
In bleacherreport.com, Cena won the poll with 35% votes.
In ign.com, Cena won the poll with 45% votes.
In fans.wwe.com, Cena won with 61% votes.
And many other websites.

Basically, in every “Who should face The Undertaker at Wrestlemania 27?” poll held in Internet Wrestling Community, John Cena schooled Sting, Goldberg, Sheamus, Triple H, Kane, and Chris Jericho!!! This reminds me of 2 years ago when Shawn Michaels schooled Triple H, Jeff Hardy, Chris Jericho, Big Show, and Vladimir Kozlov in every “Who should face The Undertaker at Wrestlemania 25?” poll held in Internet Wrestling Community!

So, what’s your opinion?

WQ2: Do u find it surprising more than half IWC (Cena’s natural enemy) wants to see the match?
WQ3: Does it surprise u that Cena vs Undertaker attracts more attention than other possible matches like Cena vs Orton or Cena vs Sheamus or Undertaker vs Sheamus or Undertaker vs Chris Jericho? Why?

Answer all 3 to win BA.

Answer by Cᴬᴺᴬᴰᴵᴬᴺ ᴸᴼᵁᴰ ᴹᴼᵁᵀᴴ
PG fans know about dirt sheets :O. Suprising.

WQ2 – No, they are ALL secret admiriers.
WQ3 – Orton & Cena don’t have any chemistry in the ring. I’m glad their fued is over.

Read Full Post »

I remember when he ”died” in 1994 (despite the feud with Yokozuna being overrated and stupid) – the ratings went sky high for his amazing coming back promos that lasted for months… That was great TV!!! And then the legendary build up for Wrestlemania 14 (one of the best storylines ever!!). Then his months lasting promos directed to Kane until Wrestlemania XX. And I believe anyone watching WWE from at least 2008 still remembers how much of an attention his banishment storyline garnered, especially in IWC.

And now this vegetative storyline. Present or absent, Taker simply rocks. I mean its amazing how this storyline has taken all of us by storm. I like it.

And what if the person who took out the Undertaker was a Masked Kane, yet the person seeking vengeance in the unmasked Kane? This could lead to a great individual self battle within Kane which would hopefully bring back the masked Kane, who would be seen as a real threat, and not just the ‘Big Red Jobber’. That would be a very good excuse to bring the mask back. Someone would convince Kane he’s the one responsible, while Kane denies such claims, ultimately lashing out and just destroying everything in his path, carrying the mask because his destructive side just got out there and took control. Yup, a WWE version of Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde…

The Undertaker will celebrate his 20th anniversary coming this November…and people still buy his gimmick. Amazing.
No, I got the DVD’s containing Taker vs Yokozuna. I started watching since WM 10, though.

Answer by |R|oyal |Y|onkers |M|achine
I know. He’s the DEADman – Why is it so shocking when they claim he’s DEAD?

I’ve seen about 10 Undertaker funerals in my day. Calm down, everyone.

Read Full Post »

Personally, I think Undertaker vs Shawn Michaels overall feud (1997, 1998, 2009-2010) is better than Taker vs Austin and Taker vs Mankind. I know Austin is a sacred name in both WWE & IWC, but you have to face it. No Taker vs Austin matches were considered ‘the best’ at all. Their feud was worshiped simply because it happened during the peak of Attitude Era. Their encounters were very typical of heel vs face and their Summerslam 1998 was flat out overrated. Sorry for saying this, but even Taker vs Batista at WM 23 was a better quality match than Taker vs Austin at SS’98.

As for Mankind, I think the Taker/Mankind matches were mainly overrrated. The Buried Alive was good, it wasn’t great, but the match type is what made the match stand out rather than the actual match itself. The Hell in A Cell between Taker/Mankind, reminded me of a car crash. It was all about bumps and can you top this. The best match I’ve ever seen between the Undertaker and Mankind was at King of the Ring 1996. That was an awesome match. All of their other matches, even the infamous Boiler Room brawl match between the Undertaker/Mankind at SummerSlam 1996 was insignificant, nothing special at all. It just raised the bar of what gimmick matches in the future should be like.

Taker and Shawn have incredible chemistry and you can see it ever time they wrestle. They may have different views, different ways of life, but inside that ring they are all pro. Their match at Ground Zero was mesmerizing. That was truly a great match. I think it is even better than their Hell in A Cell Match from Badd Blood. Both men knew what they were doing and wrestled at a slow tempo pace, which made the match even more fun and entertaining to watch. That should have been match of the year right there. Even if the match ended in a no contest it still should have been a match of the year candidate.

At Badd Blood 1997, Taker and Shawn both put on a clinic. Being Hell in a Cell, the first match of that kind, people were looking to see if both men, especially Shawn since he was calling himself the Showstopper, the Icon, and the Main Event at that time, would be able to deliver and live up to his moniker. Well he did. So did Taker. Both men told a compelling story and it had the right amount of wrestling and storytelling mixed together. The story being would Shawn Michaels be able to defeat the Giant, the man from the darkside. Would David be able to defeat Goliath. If you recall correctly this all started at SummerSlam 1997. Shawn was referring the match between Bret Hart, challenger, and the Undertaker champion. Towards the end of the match, Bret spat in Shawn’s face, Shawn grabbed a chair, swung it, and unintentionally hit the Undertaker. Bret won the match and the Title. Undertaker seeked revenge after the man that swerved him. This culminated into their match at Ground Zero, which lingered into Badd Blood. To prevent outside interference from DX, Triple H, Chyna, and Rick Rude the officials made the Hell in a Cell Match so their would be an clear winner. So Shawn and Taker delivered a wrestling climax for twenty five to thirty minutes. That bump that Shawn took where the Undertaker kicked his hand from the top of the hell in a cell was truly a OMG moment that made sense to include in the match. Foley’s bumps were unnecessary, made no sense whatsoever. Shawn’s made great sense. That’s why I say that Taker/Shawn have better chemistry because the stuff they did make sense. Foley just wanted a reaction without a logical method behind it. Anyway, Shawn went on to win the match, thanks to interference from the newly debuted Kane, but that still doesn’t take away from the match, one of the best in the history of the WWE, by two of the greatest performers in the history of WWE, Shawn Michaels and The Undertaker.

Overall, I think the Taker/Shawn matches have better wrestling. I think both guys have better chemistry in the ring. Both wrestlers just click and always deliver whenever they perform together. The Taker/Mankind matches are good storyline wise and the matches are unique. However, I think Taker and Shawn have great matches all the time and they did it again at Wrestlemania 26 (although the commentating took something away from the classic). Plus, Taker showed his respect to HBK twice ON AIR just in the span of two days, after ending his career.

And moreover, Taker got 2 Wrestlemania classics with Michaels. How many Wrestlemania classics does Taker got with Austin and Mankind?

What about u and why?

Answer by Chad Bat
Shut up, who’s gonna read all that

Read Full Post »

I mean, should a scripted streak be so impressive as people make it? What’s so impressive about it, really? It looks like the majority of the IWC consider The undertaker’s streak his most valuable accomplishment. Does people tend to forget about all the other accomplishments Taker has accomplished during his career?

BQ: Do you like The Undertaker for his streak or everything else he has accomplished?
BQ2: What do you think is the most impressive accomplishment in Pro Wrestling History?
BQ3: What’s more impressive; A scripted 18-0 undfeated streak or being entitled Mr. Wrestlemania(HBK)

Answer by Thє Lєgєnd Killєr ™ нαωкιиѕ вιggєѕт fαи
yes and if triple h ends it i couldnt care less

BQ: i respect undertaker for how athletic he is at his age and he hasnt won enought titles in his carrer
BQ2: tito sammartine holding the wwe championship for 7 years
BQ3: being entitled mr wrestlemania

Read Full Post »

One of the popular complaints from smarks regarding the Undertaker is that he “buries” talent and never puts anyone over. But history has shown that the Undertaker has put many, many Superstars over. He helped establish Mankind and Kane. He jobbed clean to the likes of Brock Lesnar, Khali, Batista, and Kozlov. He’s helped to turn Randy Orton, Edge, and Batista into main-eventers. So why does the IWC still continue to make the claim that he never puts anyone over, when evidence has shown otherwise?

Answer by random at its finest
because it seemed like taker typically gets the last laugh in the fued for each one he pushes the guys well

Read Full Post »

IWC Question&Answer:

I just watched all Undertaker’s HIAC matches from the 2000′s, and I must say both matches mentioned in the question are underrated gems. Far far better than Lesnar vs Taker in No Mercy 2002 which is infinitely overrated and over-praised by IWC, IMO. Yeah, yeah, I know every Taker vs Edge or Taker vs Batista is better than every Taker vs Lesnar, but I feel the need to ask this.

How the hell these two matches got so little mention is beyond me. Only further prove the fact both matches are so overlooked, IMO.

Answer by Johnny Sheen
TAKER VS BATISTA WAS BEST

Read Full Post »

IWC Question&Answer:

Source:

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/article/booking-plans-for-matches-at-wrestlemania-27-120389

No bashing please. And if you do bashing anyone or anything around here, u’ll be reported. U can take that to the bank, ladies and gentlemen.

This here below is my own personal list of Top 10 Undertaker’s Wrestlemania match. I’ll also give my POV but no worries it won’t affect your chance to get BA even if your opinion is different from mine….as long as your opinion is reasonable on my account. And relax, I’m a pretty reasonable guy.

Usually, most people agree with my list (although some don’t, but it’s rare). Either way let’s use this as the model and here goes:

1. Undertaker vs Shawn Michaels (Wrestlemania XXV)
2. Undertaker vs Edge (Wrestlemania XXIV)
3. Undertaker vs Shawn Michaels (Wrestlemania XXVI)
4. Undertaker vs Batista (Wrestlemania 23)
5. Undertaker vs Triple H (Wrestlemania X-7)
6. Undertaker vs Kane (Wrestlemania XIV)
7. Undertaker vs Diesel (Wrestlemania 12)
8. Undertaker vs Ric Flair (Wrestlemania X-8)
9. Undertaker vs Randy Orton (Wrestlemania 21)
10. Undertaker vs Sycho Sid (Wrestlemania 13)

What do u think? Where will it rank and why?

My POV:

For a start, I think we can agree there’s no way in effing hell Taker vs Wade would even begin to touch the top 5, seeing how Taker won’t be totally fit for the match and Wade has zero ability to carry someone to a legendary match. And yes, I’m saying Taker’s match with Wade won’t be as good as his match with Batista. Because before Batista had a WM match with Taker he had a series of great matches with legit main eventers in the form of HHH, JBL, great tag matches with Rey against Kane and Big Show, and Booker T. And he was damn over the crowd, and he wasn’t as talentless as IWC”s made him up to be. He was at his PEAK of his main event run and he was more experienced (no matter how much IWC would hate this fact) than Barrett, seeing how Wade basically stuck with dull matches against either Orton or Cena. So no, I believe Taker vs Wade won’t even lick the top 5.

On to bottom 5, a legendary match with Kane at WM 14. This has one of the, if not, finest storyline and most memorable build up of all time. Combine that with Kane’s and Taker’s astronomical chemistry at their first outings, and there u go. Not taking anything away from Wade, but I don’t think he can top this one either. After all, Wade is known for his mic skills not his wrestling skills. The fact that he is yet to put a legendary match despite constantly facing Randy Orton and John Cena, two of the biggest names in PG Era WWE, is an undisputed proof of this statement.

The next is two overlooked gems with Diesel and Ric Flair. His match with Diesel is one of the finest example how The Undertaker carried someone with so-so wrestling talent to an underrated classic. Watch the match if u don’t believe me. Too bad he couldn’t have done the same with Giant Gonzales, King Kong Bundy, Big Boss Man, A-Train, and Mark Henry. But maybe that’s also due the fact Nash was over as Diesel after a year long world title reign and no one could deny at the time he faced Taker, he was perhaps the finest monster heel in WWE.

And Taker had a wild under-appreciated brawl with Flair…a bloody one, too. Add the fact that Flair could actually move and wrestle around 2002, and he was over with the fans, and he had this legendary in-ring psychology Wade definitely lacks, not to mention his ability to sell any kind of move. So basically, the match was of guaranteed quality.

Sorry, but me thinks Taker vs Wade won’t touch any of these two either.

That leaves us with Randy Orton and Sid. Taker’s match with Sid was kinda his match with Diesel, but to a very lesser extent. Then again, Sid was built up strongly in the main event scene for years as an unstoppable monster heel equaled only by Diesel, not to mention winning a couple world titles on his run. And his match with Orton is on the list not only because it was Orton’s best Wrestlemania match to date, but also the match which rocketed the credibility of The Streak to the seventh lovely heaven.

Regardless, I can tell Taker vs Wade won’t touch any of the top 8, but has the possibility to either best Taker vs Orton or Taker vs Sid. Dunno which, tho. Of course the match can also be worse than either of those two.

So, thoughts?
Flow, I don’t get why so many people hate Taker vs Sid. It contained good back and forth action with two big men flying all over the arena.

Did we even see this kind of action in Orton vs Triple H?

Answer by Evenflow DDT – The Raven Effect
honestly i dont rate Wade Barrett as a wrestler at all. So the match fo rme, especially as Taker wont be 100%, will suck. On top of that Barrett isn’t a genuine threat at all. I guess you could say that maybe Barrett can have a breakout match here but honestly i dont see it. This match will not rank high and the only reason it could make your top ten is cause Sid sucks.

Read Full Post »

Just wondering. The IWC wants to see an idiot like Sting go against Undertaker at Wrestlemania, but they both suck and would make the worst match of the year. Then there’s Triple H. Triple H is good and all, but I don’t want to see him going against Undertaker again at Wrestlemania. Then there’s also Chris Jericho. I never understood the big deal behind this lifetime jobber. He barely won any match, and his wins were just squash matches against up and comers so he could bury them. He has no talent at all, and the IWC wants to see this Iron Maiden wannabe go against Undertaker? He has no credibility to fight Undertaker at all. There’s also that midcarder Wade Barrett. Sure, he buried Undertaker alive last year, but does he have any big name in him? No. Does he have gimmick compatibility with Undertaker? No.
So it all leaves to one man known as Mordecai. Mordecai had a great gimmick and possessed great talent. This guy is very gifted. Gifted enough to beat The Streak and become a Breakout Star. It could be the best feud Undertaker could have in his entire stupid career. So I want Mordecai to face Undertaker at next year’s Wrestlemania and beat The Streak.

Answer by SoulBrotha
lol Mordecai? Why not let Mantaur or Bastion Booger end the streak?

Read Full Post »

No bashing please. And if you do bashing anyone or anything around here, u’ll be reported. U can take that to the bank, ladies and gentlemen.

This here below is my own personal list of Top 10 Undertaker’s Wrestlemania match. I’ll also give my POV but no worries it won’t affect your chance to get BA even if your opinion is different from mine….as long as your opinion is reasonable on my account. And relax, I’m a pretty reasonable guy.

Usually, most people agree with my list (although some don’t, but it’s rare). Either way let’s use this as the model and here goes:

1. Undertaker vs Shawn Michaels (Wrestlemania XXV)
2. Undertaker vs Edge (Wrestlemania XXIV)
3. Undertaker vs Shawn Michaels (Wrestlemania XXVI)
4. Undertaker vs Batista (Wrestlemania 23)
5. Undertaker vs Triple H (Wrestlemania X-7)
6. Undertaker vs Kane (Wrestlemania XIV)
7. Undertaker vs Diesel (Wrestlemania 12)
8. Undertaker vs Ric Flair (Wrestlemania X-8)
9. Undertaker vs Randy Orton (Wrestlemania 21)
10. Undertaker vs Sycho Sid (Wrestlemania 13)

What do u think? Where will it rank and why?

My POV:

For a start, I think we can agree there’s no way in effing hell Taker vs Wade would even begin to touch the top 5, seeing how Taker won’t be totally fit for the match and Wade has zero ability to carry someone to a legendary match. And yes, I’m saying Taker’s match with Wade won’t be as good as his match with Batista. Because before Batista had a WM match with Taker he had a series of great matches with legit main eventers in the form of HHH, JBL, great tag matches with Rey against Kane and Big Show, and Booker T. And he was damn over the crowd, and he wasn’t as talentless as IWC”s made him up to be. He was at his PEAK of his main event run and he was more experienced (no matter how much IWC would hate this fact) than Barrett, seeing how Wade basically stuck with dull matches against either Orton or Cena. So no, I believe Taker vs Wade won’t even lick the top 5.

On to bottom 5, a legendary match with Kane at WM 14. This has one of the, if not, finest storyline and most memorable build up of all time. Combine that with Kane’s and Taker’s astronomical chemistry at their first outings, and there u go. Not taking anything away from Wade, but I don’t think he can top this one either.

The next is two overlooked gems with Diesel and Ric Flair. His match with Diesel is one of the finest example how The Undertaker carried someone with so-so wrestling talent to an underrated classic. Watch the match if u don’t believe me. Too bad he couldn’t have done the same with Giant Gonzales, King Kong Bundy, Big Boss Man, A-Train, and Mark Henry. But maybe that’s also due the fact Nash was over as Diesel after a year long world title reign and no one could deny at the time he faced Taker, he was perhaps the finest monster heel in WWE.

And Taker had a wild under-appreciated brawl with Flair…a bloody one, too. Add the fact that Flair could actually move and wrestle around 2002, and he was over with the fans, and he had this legendary in-ring psychology Wade definitely lacks, not to mention his ability to sell any kind of move. So basically, the match was of guaranteed quality.

Sorry, but me thinks Taker vs Wade won’t touch any of these two either.

That leaves us with Randy Orton and Sid. Taker’s match with Sid was kinda his match with Diesel, but to a very lesser extent. And his match with Orton is on the list not only because it was Orton’s best Wrestlemania match to date, but also the match which rocketed the credibility of The Streak to the seventh lovely heaven. Regardless, I can tell Taker vs Wade won’t touch any of the top 8, but has the possibility to either best Taker vs Orton or Taker vs Sid. Dunno which, tho. Of course the match can also be worse than either of those two.

So, thoughts?

Answer by romo
top 15

Read Full Post »

The way Festus goes mad as soon as the bell goes off,will that happen when the sound of a bell goes off at the start of Undertakers entrance when the two go 1 on 1 on Friday Night Smackdown??

Star Me

Answer by Shusi
that woood be funny but i think its onlee the ring bell

Read Full Post »