Posted in Breitling on Jan 15th, 2012 11 Comments »
Breitling has been creating instruments for professionals for over 120 years, growing and rising to new heights along with the aviation industry. Enjoy this tribute to these Swiss-made precision instruments. Sponsored by your-guide-to-watches.com
Video Rating: 5 / 5
Posted in Jacob & Co on Sep 23rd, 2011 5 Comments »
There were at least five nerds at my school named Jacob Black. I’d love to see how much attention they’re getting now 
Answer by skater chikka
There is no doubt in my mind.
Posted in Jacob & Co on Sep 18th, 2011 9 Comments »
Jacob & Co Question&Answer:
why do so many professing Christians deny God’s purpose according to election; the Biblical Christian doctrine of unconditional election?
Answer by No Chance Without Jesus
Again
You are not qualified to say what Jacob and Esau did, or did not do.
Posted in IWC on Sep 9th, 2011 16 Comments »
The problem there is solved why not just watch TNA and learn from there I mean if you don’t watch TNA or hate then quit watching wrestling in my opinion the IWC complains and whines and crys so much
I love wrestling for what it is not for I think it is so I support PG and also if TNA sucks quit watching wrestling kid because WWE ain’t going away from the PG era soon man
Well to answer your question I’m sick and tired of people complaing everyday this is why most of the great users left because this section is turning into a big problem everyday people say WWE sucks TNA sucks thats not what this sections about
Answer by Chris
cuz TNA Sucks!
Posted in IWC on Sep 8th, 2011 4 Comments »
I mean, before Cena continously jobbing to the fastest runner on earth, people labeled him as a superman impossible to be defeated. But it seems to me, although his haters in IWC are still a lot, many people have been viewing him not a superman any longer, but a normal face. He isn’t impossible to be defeated, Sheamus proved that over and over again.
Although I find their series of matches to be boring, honest.
Cena hating is so prehistoric, dude.
Answer by Bow Down To The Kings Of Kings
Cena is annoying period.
Posted in IWC on Aug 31st, 2011 7 Comments »
IWC Question&Answer:
I mean, we all knew Taker/Sid at WM 13 a mistake on WWE’s part (no build up at all and Bret/Austin should have gone last).
Look at the other main events after that:
WM 14: HBK vs Austin = The build up speaks for itself. No need for reminder.
WM 15: Rock vs Austin = No more need to be said.
WM 16: Rock vs Foley vs HHH vs Show = Rock/Show & HHH/Foley have been built since before Royal Rumble, so 3 months of build up although the match ended up horrible.
WM 17: Rock vs Austin = Do I even need to explain?
WM 18: HHH vs Y2J = It has been built since post Royal Rumble even tho the match ended up sucked.
WM 19: Angle vs Lesnar = They’ve been involved from like, Armageddon 2002. That means 4 months of build up.
WM 20: HBK vs HHH vs Benoit = No explanation needed.
WM 21: Batista vs HHH = A decent main event, but the build up and history between the two doesn’t need to be spoken again.
WM 22: Cena vs HHH = Another decent main event. This match had solid near 2 months build up.
WM 23: Cena vs HBK = Has been built post Royal Rumble, meaning 2 months build up.
WM 24: Edge vs Taker = Has been built since mid-2007 and late 2007. That means roughly 6 months build up.
WM 25: Orton vs HHH = The match sucked but the build up was insane. And this one is fresh so I won’t explain any further.
WM 26: Taker vs HBK = I won’t bother explaining.
I believe Taker/HHH will rock the whole roster at WM 27 (nlike most IWC who believes the match will suck), but if Taker/HHH main events, it wouldn’t be fair to Cole/King and Miz/Cena which received insane hyped & build up on weekly basis. The method of promotion they’ve employed (minimal physical interaction, long winded pseudo-dramatic interviews, reputations at stake) would have actually been effective had these 2 not had such a long history of beating the hell out of each other and matches together. Its like why are they suddenly acting like they’ve never wrestled before? i.e. If they used this kind of build up for say sting vs. taker it would be a sight to see… but you have 2 guys whom we’ve seen cover all bases in terms of angles and matches together, with nothing new nor fresh.. They’re trying to give it this big fight feel yet no matter how hard they try the stakes just don’t seem… real.. With HBK and Taker it was different because those 2 are legitimately considered the top 2 wrestlers of all time. HHH is trying to hard telling everyone he is equal to HBK & Taker where it’s clear he’s not and it didn’t work.
Too bad, this match can end up being the best Wrestlemania match ever but in the future when the fans look back to what build-up the best Wrestlemania rematch ever had, they’ll find out “Oh, it’s just the two of them staring at each other one night, HBK revealing his feelings via video promo, HHH telling everyone how great his career was, and they met at final RAW. That’s it”
If a match like HBK vs Taker had a build up, why does a match like Taker vs HHH considered to not be in a need of build up? Do they not deserve it? They how come HBK/Taker had a build up when they didn’t need it either?
Haha cant wait for the video package storyline before their match. It’s gonna suck:
“I’m the best, no I’m the best. My career is better than you. I call you out” End.
Too bad, Taker vs HHH will be a legendary match yet it has the same predictability as Taker vs Henry.
Answer by Clayton
Undertaker has beaten Triple H before on Smackdown so it wont be that awesome.
Posted in Jacob & Co on Aug 14th, 2011 5 Comments »
Since the Smoke Monster can appear to be anybody who is dead, could he have appeared to be Jacob when he talked to Hugo outside the lighthouse?
Answer by Hank
I don’t think it was. Hugo sees figments of his imagination, they aren’t really people standing there. Locke as Smokey is actually a physical being standing there.
Posted in Bell & Ross on Aug 2nd, 2011 1 Comment »
If you haven’t already heard, on Tues. 10/30 from 2-5 PM you can get 1 free regular taco from them. Go to the taco bell site for full details.
Answer by nomo
I didn’t know this thanks for the info.
Posted in IWC on Aug 2nd, 2011 4 Comments »
Just wondering. He is a Legend, I don’t get why does the IWC hate the poor guy so much. Suck it up haters! He is a 13 Time World Champion in the WWE, a WWE Record! Nobody has won as much World Titles in the WWE as Triple H! But ever since he married Steph, they began to hate on Hunter and began to give lame excuses about his success. You know what? He was already a 5 time Champ before that! Suck it up haters!
But, why are you always ignoring those facts and keep on bashing on him like he’s some John Cena or something?
Answer by Wrestling Knowledge Bank
People assume that he always buried people and didn’t want to put anyone over. Truth is he’s a good worker, but I think he can offer more to the business in his current role outside of wrestling.
Posted in IWC on Aug 1st, 2011 5 Comments »
IWC Question&Answer:
Hear me out:
2007: Nobody expected Taker to win after a long then 16 odd years of not winning the Rumble, so his victory was unpredictable. The last unpredictable victory yet.
2008: Although not many expected Cena to return, when he did it was really obvious he would win.
2009: Orton won and I think everybody expected that win since, well, WWE started talking about the Rumble and Orton kicked in McMahon’s head.
2010: Who in the IWC didn’t expect Edge to win? I thought as soon as Edge was injured and he needed “6 months off”, that “6 months” away was right in time for the Rumble…
2011: You have so many big names out of action, and so much young talent being pushed.
Triple H, Undertaker, Christian, Goldberg, Wade Barrett, Sheamus, John Morrison, Alberto Del Rio, there are many more but they’re just names being thrown around to win after returning from injury, or that are being pushed right now.
Answer the above question, and why you think so.
Answer by Alex Jones
it is more unpredictable than the last few years.
i think the most likely to take it is CM Punk.
if they have someone like HHH or Cena win it, too many people will be pissed because they’ve both won one before.
a dark horse for me to win it would be Chris Jericho. im not sure to take his claim that he’s not coming back anytime soon as a sign that he’s bluffing to make a huge comeback or if he’s serious about not coming back.
