Feed on
Posts
Comments

Marvin was founded in 1850 by two brothers (by the name of Didisheim) in Saint-Imier, in the middle of the Jura. Before we write yet-another-romantic-but-sad-story about a watch company that didn’t survive the quartz crisis in the 1970s but DID have some nice watches before that time we are going to stop here.

Just a few years ago, Marvin Watches Co was brought back to life again by its current owners, true passionate people about watches and the watch industry. We know, because we’ve met them during BaselWorld and at their current headquarters in Vaumarcus, Switzerland.

Marvin Regulator Automatic M115

The nice thing about being a watch manufacturer with some history, is that you might have some antique catalogs and drawings of watches that once were yours. Marvin has such luck, as they made pretty nice (and affordable) pieces in the 20th century. Some of their current models are also based on those vintage timepieces but Marvin also invests quite an amount of time and resources in designing new watches as well. The Loeb collection is a perfect example of that.

However, we love watches that have some ‘vintage DNA’ and picked the Marvin M115, which is their own code for the Marvin Regulator Automatic from their Malton collection. This 42mm diameter round watch has a very cool Regulator feature that we’ve seen on other watches as well (Chronoswiss, IWC, Sinn). Chronoswiss was the first to design a Regulator for a wrist watch, as it is normally something for clocks, and it has been their ‘signature’ watch ever since. Marvin designed a Regulator as well, in three different flavors and here is what we think.

Marvin M115 Regulator

Marvin achieved to design and produce a round watch with a classic looking regulator lay-out, without becoming old-fashioned. This Marvin M115 is a modern wrist watch that’s suitable for the young executive that wants to have his first decent timepiece without having to pick entry-level models from big watch manufacturers and wants to refrain from buying vintage 35mm classic watches as well. Marvin Watches Co uses a nice modern 42mm case with some kind of design signature in the side, as shown below.

Marvin Malton Collection

Inside is a Swiss made movement, based on Dubois-Dépraz caliber 14072. This movement features the Regulator lay-out, a 38-hour power reserve and a date indicator. The date indicator has a small magnifier under the sapphire crystal. As you can see below, the mechanical movement is relatively standard but does have a customized case back for Marvin. However, if you are new to mechanical watches or this will be your first mechanical timepiece, you’ll be excited to have a glance at the movement every once in a while.

Marvin M115 Regulator

As you can see above, the straps have a quick-release to be removed from the case very easily. We’ve seen this system with some Patek Philippe watches as well. By sliding the small button with your nail, you make the spring bar a bit smaller so it can be released from the watch case. A very convenient method to change your straps.

Marvin M115

We are impressed by the design of the case and the clean classic Regulator dial (without becoming a timepiece that’s too classic for young people). The M115 comes with a black dial with grey sub dials, a grained silver dial and a white dial. We’d pick either the grained silver dial or the white dial with the very nice blue hands and matching blue numerals. Being able to read a Regulator dial is a matter of just moments and this feature does give a nice classic nod to the timepiece.

A watch for just over 3000 USD ($ 3120 USD) with a good solid Swiss made mechanical movement, original case design, wonderful designed dial, Regulator feature, a leather quality strap and nicely finished buckle is hard to find these days. The big brands are all scaling up which makes some room for a number of smaller brands with very interesting (and uncommon) timepieces that jump into that gap of $ 1000 – $ 3000 USD watches. Marvin watches start at under $ 1000 USD and go up to approx $ 3000 USD.

You can see and order their watches on-line, or through a selected number of dealers.


From:FratelloWatches RSS

Read Full Post »

The Chopard L.U.C. Triple Certification Watch

A world first: the Chopard L.U.C. Triple Certification Watch

Written by: Vanessa Formato

Chopard has achieved a feat that was previously unimaginable in the watchmaking world with its L.U.C Triple Certification Tourbillon Watch. As the timepiece’s name suggests, this watch has received three prestigious certificates from the most well-respected watch authorities, making this watch perhaps the most well-crafted and reliable one in history.

The three certifications that this Chopard watch received are the Swiss Official Chronometer Testing Institute (Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomètres, abbreviated as COSC) certificate,  the Poinçon de Genève quality hallmark and the Fleurier Quality Foundation label. Each certificate assessed different aspects of the watch’s technical quality.

The COSC certification judges whether watches can be considered chronometers, and the COSC is the only organization that may bestow that title. The testing involves 15 days of tests where the watch is monitored in varying conditions, like different positions and temperatures, to see if it maintains accuracy.

To receive the Poinçon de Genève quality hallmark– also known as the Geneva Seal– watches must meet a variety of technical requirements over 12 criteria ranging from craftsmanship to movement construction to the integrity of the materials.

The Fleurier Quality Foundation label can only be achieved by subjecting watches to a rigorous series of tests that, above all else, determine the timepiece’s long-term durability. The tests last for 21 days and are meant to simulate six months of everyday wear. The watch is subjected to different levels of humidity and wrist movement simulations. It must also prove that it can endure a certain amount of impact. This certification is very difficult to obtain.

While Chopard’s watches have received these certifications individually in the past, it is the first time that any of their watches have received all three simultaneously. This is an accomplishment that watchmakers of a similar caliber are yet to achieve. No other watch created by another other brand has received all three certifications.

The  L.U.C Triple Certification Tourbillon is not purely a functional piece. Chopard has successfully married form and function with this particular watch, featuring 18-carat rose gold, bold Roman numerals and an alligator leather band.

Only 100 of this record-breaking watch will be produced and the price is yet to be announced. For the supreme quality that buyers will receive, it is safe to say that this it will be worth the investment, a piece that will be passed down for generations.

 

From:Luxury Watches That Impress Review Blog

Read Full Post »

Question by Katrocious
Best answer:

Answer by fashionlover
i’d look on ebay

Read Full Post »

Check out these rolex images:

All this racing makes Spike tired
rolex

2007-09-01 01:34:17 by:SoxyLady

1952 Allard K2 6423cc
rolex

2007-08-31 23:16:07 by:SoxyLady

Read Full Post »

A few nice rolex images I found:

All this racing makes Spike tired
rolex

2007-09-01 01:34:17 by:SoxyLady

1952 Allard K2 6423cc
rolex

2007-08-31 23:16:07 by:SoxyLady

Read Full Post »

Question by Dana

Does anyone know of other brands that make watches like the Breo Roam? I know I;ve seen them at festivals but can’t find them any where. Thanks

Best answer:

Answer by Bri
here are a few that i found that are similar:

http://www.ioffer.com/i/decompression-table-anion-watch-sports-watches-154044265?source=eisi

http://www.ioffer.com/i/6pcs-anion-negative-ion-silicone-sports-bracelet-watch-158707113?source=eisi

http://www.1topstore.com/product_info.php?language=en&currency=USD&products_id=12354

Hope i was able to help!!

Read Full Post »

Bell & Ross Question&Answer:

Question by syrious

I found little green bugs, oval, and less than 2mm long, on the bottoms of the leaves. I am assuming they are the culprits. How do I get rid of them ?…..witout killing the bees, if possible. I live in northern CA.

Best answer:

Answer by NigHtaRRoW
er..try pesticides. Shouldn’t there be some kinds that don’t affect larger insects? If that dosen’t work, torch those little buggers.

Read Full Post »

Question by The Clown Prince of Crime

I’m sorry, I heard this from several high profiled users in this section and some other sites so I feel the need to ask. I realized IWC will always cherish any new talent possible, especially the heel ones.

The question is, who in their right mind would believe Undertaker vs Sheamus would be the right follow up of Undertaker vs Shawn Michaels? I’m not trying to offend anyone, but I don’t think Undertaker vs Sheamus would get ‘This is awesome!’ from the crowd or make the crowds stood from start to finish. And by all means, be it status wise or ability wise, Sheamus is nowhere near Shawn Michaels. Not in this lifetime, or the next.

Not to mention, I think we all knew who’s going to win the match. Because if HHH’s best buddy for life couldn’t end The Streak twice, I don’t think his mere workout buddy would.

The Streak lacks big names and credibility thanks to the six nobodies (Giant Gonzales, King Kong Bundy, Big Boss Man, Big Show, A-Train, and Mark Henry), I don’t think we need another no namers to be included on it. The least of all, although the match may not be able to follow Undertaker vs Shawn Michaels TWICE, big name like Jericho would give a bigger credibility.
See? LP23 believe Sheamus vs Undertaker could follow Shawn Michaels vs Undertaker TWICE!

By the time Taker won the match, IWC will accuse him of not putting over Sheamus.
True LP23, The Undertaker has carried so many talents before, but he succeeded on carrying them all?

Undertaker vs Giant Gonzales at WM IX was The Undertaker’s worst match ever.

Undertaker vs King Kong Bundy at WM XI was one of the worst booked matches ever.

Undertaker vs Big Boss Man at WM XV was the worst Hell In A Cell Match ever.

Undertaker vs Big Show & A-Train at WM XIX was one of the worst booked matches ever.

Undertaker vs Mark Henry at WM XXII was the worst casket match ever.

See? No guarantee at all, dude.

And for Red, I have stated Sheamus lacks the ‘big name’ factor.
@Red: Bigger than Jericho?

@LP23: That still counts as failure, 300 pounds or not. Those matches I mentioned are still the living proof of Taker not being able to carry some guys into great matches.
@sharpshooter: I agree with what you’re trying to say. I admit Sheamus got the talent, but what I hate from the possible matchup is he doesn’t have the ‘big name’ factor like I stated.

And more, if Taker does defeat Sheamus, The Undertaker hating bandwagon in IWC will rise again and start cursing Taker for not putting someone over (again). U know, just like what happened after he defeated Punk last year.
@Red: No, but I did.
@Red: OK, if u want it I’ll clarify it for u why I said ‘bigger than Jericho’.

At this point, The Streak isn’t only about the quality of the match, but also the name inside it.

Giant Gonzales over Hulk Hogan, King Kong Bundy over Bret Hart, Big Boss Man over Mankind, Big Show & A-Train over Eddie Guerrero & Rey Mysterio, and Mark Henry over Kurt Angle or Chris Benoit.

I think we all knew Hogan, Bret, Mankind, Eddie, Rey, Benoit, or Angle will ALWAYS be the bigger legends than the six nobodies. But Taker never got the chance to fight them at WM because Vince has always been crazy of giants. Sheamus is the same, at this point his name isn’t bigger than Jericho. Jericho IS a big name, Sheamus’ name isn’t as big as his. And there’s no guarantee Sheamus’ name will ever be as big as his.

Simply put, I want a ‘legit’ big name than a ‘possible’ ones. A-Train was released 6 months after his WM match with Taker, who said Sheamus won’t suffer the same fate as Kennedy?
(Continuation from above):

Or who can guarantee Sheamus will not suffer the same fate as A-Train?

If the honor goes to Sheamus, the another legit big name (Jericho) would miss his chance to be included on The Streak.

It’s not only about the quality, but also the name. Legit ones are always more credible than the possible ones. Not every wrestler is Randy Orton, u know?
@sharpshooter: Eh, I don’t think Jericho would refuse to be a part of The Streak. Before Shawn Michaels wanting to retire, he original plan for WM 26 was for Jericho to face Taker, remember?

BTW, Gonzales, Bundy, and Boss Man are still a waste, whether they go out peacefully or not. The same can be said about Big Show & Mark Henry.
@Red: You want names, here I’ll give you some:

1. Christian (see their match on youtube at RAW on 2001, a damn great match!)

2. Swagger (see their match at RAW last month? Better booking means we could see a greater match. Same as Sheamus, his name isn’t as big as other legit ones, but since we knew how well he worked with Taker so why not? Legit ones over possible ones, dude)

3. Danielson (HBK’s protege. And we all knew how well Taker would work with technical wrestlers. See Summerslam 1997, No Way Out 2006, Wrestlemania XXIV, Wrestlemania XXV, and Wrestlemania XXVI for fruther information).

4. Rey Mysterio (see Royal Rumble 2010. And remember? Legit big name over possible big name).
@sharpshooter: Fast powerhouses? Maybe u might want to watch Diesel vs Taker at WM 12 or Sid vs Taker at WM 13 as well, those 2 matches are really underrated it’s not even funny.

And I catch your drift. The only think I’m inclined to disagree is ‘the big name’ factor. I will always prefer legit ones over possible ones.

And about the variety on The Streak, I think The Streak has enough variety. From legends, youngsters, veterans, to nobodies, The Streak got them all. Let’s add more ‘legends’ to it, no?
@Red: I stated it clear enough on number 2.

Didn’t you believe Sheamus name will be bigger in one year? Why couldn’t Swagger be the same?
@sharpshooter: Wow, this conversation is really tiring yet amusing (^^).

Yeah, we can’t see the future. I can’t deny that, we’re no fortune tellers. That’s why the ‘legit ones’ are better than the ‘possible ones’. You’re right, maybe no one can change my mind for the time being, but I’m pretty open for things.

I don’t hate Sheamus by all means. I admit he’s talented and I don’t mind Taker feuding with him, but just not at Wrestlemania. There was one hit (Orton) alright, but there was also five misses (the six nobodies). I don’t want to see Taker taking the risk and slot for another victim only to see the sixth miss.

I mean, why can’t we have Taker vs legends at WM but Taker vs Sheamus at somewhere else? Look at Mankind, Lesnar, and Kennedy. Taker never faced any of them at WM (and never will) yet look how far he pushed them.

If anything, I’m all for Sheamus vs Taker at Survivor Series or Summerslam. But definitely not at WM.

Legit ones over the possible ones.

Best answer:

Answer by |Y|onkers |R|oyal |V|iper
Undertaker/Sheamus? Eww, Hell no.

I would like to see Undertaker/HHH next year. I feel that Taker’s last few WM Matches should be really high profile and have the potential to follow up both HBK/Takers.

I don’t think Sheamus should be added to the list because it’s too obvious and too early.

Read Full Post »

Jacob & Co Question&Answer:

Question by say whaaaa?

page number please!

THANKSSSSS!

Best answer:

Answer by Megan
page 329

Read Full Post »

Question by gwbush_is_cool

I know we all can agree that Taco Bell is the greatest food on the planet, but what is your favorite dish they make?

Best answer:

Answer by decrepid1958
Advertising and Ignorance, Chicken Chilli Fajhitas

Read Full Post »

Next »